I read Library 2.0: A Guide to Participatory Library Service by Michael E. Casey and Laura C. Savastinuk (available through CCL) before the Library 2.0 seminar we attended in October, hoping to get a grasp of 2.0. While the book was interesting and attempted to define and explain the concept of Library 2.0, there wasn’t much demonstration of exactly how the ideas could be incorporated into public libraries.
Just read Basic Competencies of a 2.0 Librarian: Why Learn This Stuff? and can see the validity of his points.
While I realize the world is heading in a 2.0 direction, there are issues to be addressed. In our zeal to get youth and those computer-oriented to participate in the library world, we must be careful of extremes.
I believe there is a difference between information and knowledge, which is based more on long-term exposure and expertise. Yes, we can find lots of quick information that can be useful, but it desirable to sacrifice depth?
Found an article (a bit lengthy) that addresses many aspects of what I believe could be some of the limitations of 2.0. dominance.
Literacy Debate: Online, R U Really Reading? Available at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/27/books/27reading.html